Relay vs bridge vs exit — what to run
A Tor relay passes traffic between other Tor nodes without being an exit point — lowest legal risk, still highly useful. A bridge is an unlisted relay used by censored users. An exit node sends traffic to the open internet, carrying the most legal exposure because abuse reports go to its operator. Pick based on your tolerance for abuse handling: relay/bridge are near-zero maintenance; exits require a contact address and willingness to respond to reports.
Why jurisdiction matters for Tor
The operator of a Tor exit is legally treated differently across countries. Iceland and Romania have strong precedents protecting operators from liability for exit traffic. Moldova and the Netherlands are tolerant in practice. Avoid jurisdictions where the operator can be held strictly liable for user traffic. AnonPort pre-filters locations for Tor-friendly legal frameworks.
Recommended specs
A VPS-S (2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM, 60 GB NVMe, 1 Gbps uplink) is enough for a relay handling 5 TB/month. VPS-M is a better fit for high-throughput relays, bridges serving many clients, or exits. Dedicated hardware is overkill unless you're running a Guard + Directory Authority cluster.
Recommended jurisdictions for Tor
These jurisdictions combine legal tolerance for Tor operators with the performance and connectivity needed for relay traffic.
Iceland
Free Speech HavenStrong privacy laws, renewable energy, outside EU.
Moldova
Budget OffshoreLight regulation, low prices, minimal intl cooperation.
Romania
Anti-RetentionCourts struck down data retention laws. Great EU connectivity.
Netherlands
Best PeeringExcellent connectivity, tolerant hosting, AMS-IX peering.
Recommended Tor relay plans
Plans selected for the bandwidth, IP reputation, and jurisdictional properties Tor operators need.